Understanding unfair terms in contracts

September 30, 2024

One of the main reasons for seeking a attorney, when faced with a contract that will generate rights and obligations for the parties, is to seek the best advice to avoid various pitfalls, among them, the dreaded unfair terms, which can cause numerous problems for one of the contracting parties.

Definition of Unfair Term

But what is an unfair term?

An unfair term is a contractual provision that places one of the parties at an excessive or disproportionate disadvantage, contrary to the principles of good faith, equity and contractual balance.

It is important to highlight that unfair terms are most frequently seen in standard form contracts — a type of contract concluded by two parties, in which the rights, duties and conditions are established by the proponent, the adherent being unable to discuss or modify its content or being able to exercise this power only in a very limited way — and in consumer relations, where one of the parties, usually the consumer, has less negotiating power.

For a term to be considered unfair, it must:

  1. Contravene the principles of good faith and balance in contractual relationships.
  2. Impose an unreasonable disadvantage on one of the parties, especially on the consumer.
  3. Restrict fundamental rights, such as waiving legal guarantees or imposing disproportionate conditions.

• Who determines whether a Terms is Unfair?

The identification of an unfair term is not automatic and depends on a joint analysis of the context of the contract, the negotiation conditions and the parties involved.

Who can determine that a clause is abusive:

  1. A Judge: In the event of a legal dispute, a judge will analyze the contract and decide whether a term is unfair, based on current legislation and general principles of law, such as, for example, objective good faith and contractual balance. When declaring the nullity of an unfair term, the judge must maintain the other provisions of the contract valid, whenever possible.
  2. The Contracting Party: Although the judge is the final authority to declare a term unfair, the injured party (usually the consumer) can identify a potentially unfair term and request its review or annulment, either through a direct complaint to the supplier or through the courts. It is true that the contracting parties may also, before a legal dispute is instituted, negotiate the removal or modification of unfair terms.
  3. Consumer Protection Agencies: Entities such as Brazil’s Consumer Protection Office (PROCON) or the Brazilian Consumer Secretariat (SENACON) can also identify unfair terms in adhesion contracts and intervene to protect consumer rights, and may apply administrative sanctions to suppliers of goods or services that use such terms.

However, if there is a divergence of understanding, the judge ends up being the one who has the power to judge and declare a term as unfair in a legal proceeding.

Legal Basis for Identifying and Combating of Unfair Terms in Consumer Relations

The legal basis for identifying and canceling unfair terms in Brazil is found mainly in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code (CDC), Law #8,078/1990.

The main provisions to help combat unfair terms are found in Articles 6, 39, 46, and 47 of the CDC, as set out below:

Article

Description

6

Article 6. The basic rights of the consumer are:

I – protection of life, health, and safety against risks caused by practices in the supply of products and services considered dangerous or harmful;

II – education and dissemination on the appropriate consumption of products and services, ensuring freedom of choice and equality in hiring;

III – adequate and clear information about the different products and services, with correct specification of quantity, characteristics, composition, quality, applicable taxes, and price, as well as the risks they present;

IV – protection against misleading and abusive advertising, coercive or unfair commercial methods, as well as against unfair or imposed practices and terms in the supply of products and services;

V – modification of contractual terms that establish disproportionate payments or their review due to supervening facts that make them excessively onerous;

VI – effective prevention and repair of patrimonial and moral damages, individual, collective and diffuse;

VII – access to judicial and administrative bodies with a view to preventing or repairing patrimonial and moral damages, whether individual, collective or diffuse, ensuring legal, administrative and technical protection to those in need;

VIII – having the defense of their rights facilitated, including the reversal of the burden of proof in their favor in civil proceedings, when, at the judge's discretion, the allegation is plausible or when they are at a disadvantage, according to the ordinary rules of experience;

IX – (Vetoed);

X – the adequate and effective provision of public services in general;

XI – the guarantee of responsible credit practices, financial education and prevention and treatment of over-indebtedness situations, preserving the existential minimum, in accordance with the regulations, through debt review and renegotiation, among other measures;

XII – preservation of the existential minimum, in accordance with the regulations, in the renegotiation of debts and in the granting of credit;

XIII – information about the prices of products per unit of measurement, such as per kilo, per liter, per meter, or per other unit, as applicable.

39

Article 39. Suppliers of products or services are prohibited from, among other abusive practices:

I – conditioning the supply of a product or service on the supply of another product or service, as well as, without legitimate cause, on quantitative limits;

II – refusing to meet consumer demands, to the exact extent of their stock availability, and also in accordance with customs and practices;

III – sending or deliver to the consumer, without prior request, any product, or providing any service;

IV – taking advantage of the consumer's weakness or ignorance, taking into account their age, health, knowledge or social status, to impose their products or services on them;

V – demanding a manifestly excessive advantage from the consumer;

VI – performing services without prior preparation of a budget and express authorization from the consumer, except for those arising from previous practices between the parties;

VII – passing on derogatory information, referring to an act carried out by the consumer in the exercise of their rights;

VIII – placing on the consumer market any product or service that does not comply with the standards issued by the competent official bodies or, if specific standards do not exist, by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT) or another entity accredited by the National Council of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality (Conmetro);

IX – refusing to sell goods or provide services directly to anyone willing to purchase them in exchange for immediate payment, except in cases of intermediation regulated by special laws;

X – raising the price of products or services without legitimate cause;

XI – Device included by MPV #1,890-67, of 10/22/1999 , transformed into item XIII, when converted into Law #9,870, of November 23, 1999 ;

XII – failing to stipulate a deadline for fulfilling its obligation or leaving the determination of its initial term to its sole discretion;

XIII – applying a formula or adjustment index other than that legally or contractually established;

XIV – allowing entry into commercial or service establishments of a greater number of consumers than that set by the administrative authority as the maximum.

46

Contracts regulating consumer relations shall not be binding on consumers if they are not given the opportunity to become aware of their content in advance, or if the respective instruments are drafted in such a way as to make it difficult to understand their meaning and scope.

47

Contractual clauses will be interpreted in a manner that is most favorable to the consumer.

On the other hand, Article 51 of the CDC lists the types of clauses that would be considered abusive:

Article

Description

51

Article 51. The contractual clauses, among others, relating to the supply of products and services are null and void if they:

I – make it impossible, exempt or mitigate the supplier’s liability for defects of any nature in the products and services or imply waiver or disposal of rights. In consumer relations between the supplier and the legal entity consumer, compensation may be limited, in justifiable situations;

II – remove from the consumer the option of reimbursement of the amount already paid, in the cases provided for in the present code;

III – transfer responsibilities to third parties;

IV – establish obligations considered unfair, abusive, which place the consumer at an exaggerated disadvantage, or are incompatible with good faith or equity;

V – (Vetoed);

VI – establish a reversal of the burden of proof to the detriment of the consumer;

VII – determine the compulsory use of arbitration;

VIII – impose a representative to conclude or carry out another legal transaction on behalf of the consumer;

IX – give the supplier the option of concluding the contract or not, although obliging the consumer;

X – allow the supplier, directly or indirectly, to vary the price unilaterally;

XI – authorize the supplier to cancel the contract unilaterally, without the same right being granted to the consumer;

XII – oblige the consumer to reimburse the costs of collecting their obligation, without the same right being granted to them against the supplier;

XIII – authorize the supplier to unilaterally modify the content or quality of the contract, after its conclusion;

XIV – violate or enable the violation of environmental standards;

XV – are in disagreement with the consumer protection system;

XVI – allow for the waiver of the right to compensation for necessary improvements.

XVII – condition or limit in any way access to the bodies of the Judiciary;

XVIII – establish grace periods in the event of late payment of monthly payments or prevent the full reestablishment of the consumer's rights and means of payment after the default is cleared or an agreement is reached with creditors;

XIX – (VETOED).

Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Contracts in General

Although unfair terms are initially associated with consumer relations (at least because the Consumer Protection Code is the only Brazilian law that contains a list of unfair terms, thus named, as described above), there are other contracts of different natures that present excessively disproportionate clauses, which can be even considered leonine, as they harm the contractual balance between the contracting parties.

Law #10,406/2022, better known as the Brazilian Civil Code, addresses the issue of unfair terms and contractual balance in several articles, which can be applied to contracts in general, including those that do not involve consumer relations or even consumers, but civil or commercial relations, involving individuals or legal entities. The following articles must be carefully observed by those responsible for analyzing a contractual instrument:

Article

Description

187

Also committing an illicit act is the holder of a right who, in exercising it, manifestly exceeds the limits imposed by its economic or social purpose, by good faith or by good customs.

421

Contractual freedom will be exercised within the boundaries of the social function of the contract.

421-A

Civil and business contracts are presumed to be equal and symmetrical until the presence of concrete elements that justify the departure from this presumption, except for the legal regimes provided for in special laws, also ensuring that:

I – the negotiating parties may establish objective parameters for the interpretation of the negotiating clauses and their assumptions for review or resolution;

II – the allocation of risks defined by the parties must be respected and observed; and

III – contractual review will only occur in an exceptional and limited manner.

422

Contractors are obliged to keep, both in the conclusion of the contract and in its performance, the principles of honesty and good faith.

423

When there are ambiguous or contradictory clauses in the adhesion contract, the interpretation most favorable to the adherent must be adopted.

424

In adhesion contracts, terms that stipulate the early waiver by the adherent of a right resulting from the nature of the business are null and void.

478

In contracts with continuous or deferred performance, if the obligation of one of the parties becomes excessively onerous, with extreme advantage for the other, due to extraordinary and unpredictable events, the debtor may request the termination of the contract. The effects of the decision will be retroactive to the date of service.

Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Free Competition

Another extremely important source for combating unfair terms, especially in contracts whose nature impacts free competition, is Article 36 of Law #12,529/2013, also known as the Antitrust Law, which defines as economic infractions, regardless of fault, acts in any form manifested, which have as their object or may produce the following effects, even if they are not achieved:

1. limit, distort or in any way harm free competition or free enterprise;

2. dominate the relevant market for goods or services;

3. arbitrarily increase profits; and

4. abusively exercise a dominant position.

Furthermore, the aforementioned legal provision lists the conduct that characterizes an infraction of the economic order, making it clear that if any other conduct characterizes one of the conditions described above, it will also be considered an infraction of the economic order:

1. agree, combine, manipulate or adjust with a competitor, in any form:

a) the prices of goods or services offered individually;

b) the production or marketing of a restricted or limited quantity of goods or the provision of a restricted or limited number, volume or frequency of services;

c) the division of parts or segments of a current or potential market for goods or services, by means of, among others, the distribution of customers, suppliers, regions or periods;

d) prices, conditions, advantages or abstention in public bidding;

2. promote, obtain or influence the adoption of uniform or concerted commercial conduct among competitors;

3. limit or prevent new companies from accessing the market;

4. create difficulties in the establishment, operation or development of a competing company or supplier, purchaser or financier of goods or services;

5. prevent competitors from accessing sources of inputs, raw materials, equipment or technology, as well as distribution channels;

6. demand or grant exclusivity for the dissemination of advertising in the mass media;

7. use deceptive means to cause third party prices to fluctuate;

8. regulate markets for goods or services, establishing agreements to limit or control research and technological development, the production of goods or the provision of services, or to hinder investments intended for the production of goods or services or their distribution;

9. impose, in the trade of goods or services, on distributors, retailers and representatives resale prices, discounts, payment terms, minimum or maximum quantities, profit margin or any other marketing conditions relating to their business with third parties;

10. discriminate against purchasers or suppliers of goods or services by means of differentiated pricing or operating conditions for the sale or provision of services;

11. refuse to sell goods or provide services, within the payment conditions normal to commercial customs and practices;

12. hinder or interrupt the continuity or development of indefinite-term commercial relations due to the other party's refusal to submit to unjustifiable or anti-competitive commercial clauses and conditions;

13. destroy, render useless or hoard raw materials, intermediate or finished products, as well as destroy, render useless or hinder the operation of equipment intended to produce, distribute or transport them;

14. hoard or prevent the exploitation of industrial or intellectual property rights or technology;

15. sell goods or providing services unjustifiably below cost price;

16. retain production or consumer goods, except to ensure coverage of production costs;

17. partially or totally cease the company's activities without proven legitimate cause;  

18. making the sale of a good subject to the acquisition of another or the use of a service, or making the provision of a service subject to the use of another or the acquisition of a good; and

19. the abusive exercise or exploitation of industrial, intellectual, technology or trademark property rights.

What to do when faced with Unfair Terms?

When faced with unfair terms, it is recommended that the contracting party adopt the following measures:

1. Seek an amicable solution with the other contracting party, already taking a suggestion to modify the aforementioned clause, in order to seek contractual balance;

2. If the first step is unsuccessful and it is a consumer relationship, it is recommended that consumer protection and defense entities be sought;

3. If the second step is unsuccessful or if it is not a consumer relationship, it is recommended that the injured party seeks to defend their rights before the judiciary, so that the unfair term in question can be declared null and void by the judge.

It is important to remember that, if the unfair term is declared null and void, the remainder of the contract, as a rule, remains in full force; unless such clause is essential to its nature.

RECENT POSTS

LINKEDIN FEED

Newsletter

Register your email and receive our updates

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Newsletter

Register your email and receive our updates-

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Licks Attorneys' Government Affairs & International Relations Blog

Doing Business in Brazil: Political and economic landscape

Licks Attorneys' COMPLIANCE Blog

Understanding unfair terms in contracts

No items found.

One of the main reasons for seeking a attorney, when faced with a contract that will generate rights and obligations for the parties, is to seek the best advice to avoid various pitfalls, among them, the dreaded unfair terms, which can cause numerous problems for one of the contracting parties.

Definition of Unfair Term

But what is an unfair term?

An unfair term is a contractual provision that places one of the parties at an excessive or disproportionate disadvantage, contrary to the principles of good faith, equity and contractual balance.

It is important to highlight that unfair terms are most frequently seen in standard form contracts — a type of contract concluded by two parties, in which the rights, duties and conditions are established by the proponent, the adherent being unable to discuss or modify its content or being able to exercise this power only in a very limited way — and in consumer relations, where one of the parties, usually the consumer, has less negotiating power.

For a term to be considered unfair, it must:

  1. Contravene the principles of good faith and balance in contractual relationships.
  2. Impose an unreasonable disadvantage on one of the parties, especially on the consumer.
  3. Restrict fundamental rights, such as waiving legal guarantees or imposing disproportionate conditions.

• Who determines whether a Terms is Unfair?

The identification of an unfair term is not automatic and depends on a joint analysis of the context of the contract, the negotiation conditions and the parties involved.

Who can determine that a clause is abusive:

  1. A Judge: In the event of a legal dispute, a judge will analyze the contract and decide whether a term is unfair, based on current legislation and general principles of law, such as, for example, objective good faith and contractual balance. When declaring the nullity of an unfair term, the judge must maintain the other provisions of the contract valid, whenever possible.
  2. The Contracting Party: Although the judge is the final authority to declare a term unfair, the injured party (usually the consumer) can identify a potentially unfair term and request its review or annulment, either through a direct complaint to the supplier or through the courts. It is true that the contracting parties may also, before a legal dispute is instituted, negotiate the removal or modification of unfair terms.
  3. Consumer Protection Agencies: Entities such as Brazil’s Consumer Protection Office (PROCON) or the Brazilian Consumer Secretariat (SENACON) can also identify unfair terms in adhesion contracts and intervene to protect consumer rights, and may apply administrative sanctions to suppliers of goods or services that use such terms.

However, if there is a divergence of understanding, the judge ends up being the one who has the power to judge and declare a term as unfair in a legal proceeding.

Legal Basis for Identifying and Combating of Unfair Terms in Consumer Relations

The legal basis for identifying and canceling unfair terms in Brazil is found mainly in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code (CDC), Law #8,078/1990.

The main provisions to help combat unfair terms are found in Articles 6, 39, 46, and 47 of the CDC, as set out below:

Article

Description

6

Article 6. The basic rights of the consumer are:

I – protection of life, health, and safety against risks caused by practices in the supply of products and services considered dangerous or harmful;

II – education and dissemination on the appropriate consumption of products and services, ensuring freedom of choice and equality in hiring;

III – adequate and clear information about the different products and services, with correct specification of quantity, characteristics, composition, quality, applicable taxes, and price, as well as the risks they present;

IV – protection against misleading and abusive advertising, coercive or unfair commercial methods, as well as against unfair or imposed practices and terms in the supply of products and services;

V – modification of contractual terms that establish disproportionate payments or their review due to supervening facts that make them excessively onerous;

VI – effective prevention and repair of patrimonial and moral damages, individual, collective and diffuse;

VII – access to judicial and administrative bodies with a view to preventing or repairing patrimonial and moral damages, whether individual, collective or diffuse, ensuring legal, administrative and technical protection to those in need;

VIII – having the defense of their rights facilitated, including the reversal of the burden of proof in their favor in civil proceedings, when, at the judge's discretion, the allegation is plausible or when they are at a disadvantage, according to the ordinary rules of experience;

IX – (Vetoed);

X – the adequate and effective provision of public services in general;

XI – the guarantee of responsible credit practices, financial education and prevention and treatment of over-indebtedness situations, preserving the existential minimum, in accordance with the regulations, through debt review and renegotiation, among other measures;

XII – preservation of the existential minimum, in accordance with the regulations, in the renegotiation of debts and in the granting of credit;

XIII – information about the prices of products per unit of measurement, such as per kilo, per liter, per meter, or per other unit, as applicable.

39

Article 39. Suppliers of products or services are prohibited from, among other abusive practices:

I – conditioning the supply of a product or service on the supply of another product or service, as well as, without legitimate cause, on quantitative limits;

II – refusing to meet consumer demands, to the exact extent of their stock availability, and also in accordance with customs and practices;

III – sending or deliver to the consumer, without prior request, any product, or providing any service;

IV – taking advantage of the consumer's weakness or ignorance, taking into account their age, health, knowledge or social status, to impose their products or services on them;

V – demanding a manifestly excessive advantage from the consumer;

VI – performing services without prior preparation of a budget and express authorization from the consumer, except for those arising from previous practices between the parties;

VII – passing on derogatory information, referring to an act carried out by the consumer in the exercise of their rights;

VIII – placing on the consumer market any product or service that does not comply with the standards issued by the competent official bodies or, if specific standards do not exist, by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT) or another entity accredited by the National Council of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality (Conmetro);

IX – refusing to sell goods or provide services directly to anyone willing to purchase them in exchange for immediate payment, except in cases of intermediation regulated by special laws;

X – raising the price of products or services without legitimate cause;

XI – Device included by MPV #1,890-67, of 10/22/1999 , transformed into item XIII, when converted into Law #9,870, of November 23, 1999 ;

XII – failing to stipulate a deadline for fulfilling its obligation or leaving the determination of its initial term to its sole discretion;

XIII – applying a formula or adjustment index other than that legally or contractually established;

XIV – allowing entry into commercial or service establishments of a greater number of consumers than that set by the administrative authority as the maximum.

46

Contracts regulating consumer relations shall not be binding on consumers if they are not given the opportunity to become aware of their content in advance, or if the respective instruments are drafted in such a way as to make it difficult to understand their meaning and scope.

47

Contractual clauses will be interpreted in a manner that is most favorable to the consumer.

On the other hand, Article 51 of the CDC lists the types of clauses that would be considered abusive:

Article

Description

51

Article 51. The contractual clauses, among others, relating to the supply of products and services are null and void if they:

I – make it impossible, exempt or mitigate the supplier’s liability for defects of any nature in the products and services or imply waiver or disposal of rights. In consumer relations between the supplier and the legal entity consumer, compensation may be limited, in justifiable situations;

II – remove from the consumer the option of reimbursement of the amount already paid, in the cases provided for in the present code;

III – transfer responsibilities to third parties;

IV – establish obligations considered unfair, abusive, which place the consumer at an exaggerated disadvantage, or are incompatible with good faith or equity;

V – (Vetoed);

VI – establish a reversal of the burden of proof to the detriment of the consumer;

VII – determine the compulsory use of arbitration;

VIII – impose a representative to conclude or carry out another legal transaction on behalf of the consumer;

IX – give the supplier the option of concluding the contract or not, although obliging the consumer;

X – allow the supplier, directly or indirectly, to vary the price unilaterally;

XI – authorize the supplier to cancel the contract unilaterally, without the same right being granted to the consumer;

XII – oblige the consumer to reimburse the costs of collecting their obligation, without the same right being granted to them against the supplier;

XIII – authorize the supplier to unilaterally modify the content or quality of the contract, after its conclusion;

XIV – violate or enable the violation of environmental standards;

XV – are in disagreement with the consumer protection system;

XVI – allow for the waiver of the right to compensation for necessary improvements.

XVII – condition or limit in any way access to the bodies of the Judiciary;

XVIII – establish grace periods in the event of late payment of monthly payments or prevent the full reestablishment of the consumer's rights and means of payment after the default is cleared or an agreement is reached with creditors;

XIX – (VETOED).

Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Contracts in General

Although unfair terms are initially associated with consumer relations (at least because the Consumer Protection Code is the only Brazilian law that contains a list of unfair terms, thus named, as described above), there are other contracts of different natures that present excessively disproportionate clauses, which can be even considered leonine, as they harm the contractual balance between the contracting parties.

Law #10,406/2022, better known as the Brazilian Civil Code, addresses the issue of unfair terms and contractual balance in several articles, which can be applied to contracts in general, including those that do not involve consumer relations or even consumers, but civil or commercial relations, involving individuals or legal entities. The following articles must be carefully observed by those responsible for analyzing a contractual instrument:

Article

Description

187

Also committing an illicit act is the holder of a right who, in exercising it, manifestly exceeds the limits imposed by its economic or social purpose, by good faith or by good customs.

421

Contractual freedom will be exercised within the boundaries of the social function of the contract.

421-A

Civil and business contracts are presumed to be equal and symmetrical until the presence of concrete elements that justify the departure from this presumption, except for the legal regimes provided for in special laws, also ensuring that:

I – the negotiating parties may establish objective parameters for the interpretation of the negotiating clauses and their assumptions for review or resolution;

II – the allocation of risks defined by the parties must be respected and observed; and

III – contractual review will only occur in an exceptional and limited manner.

422

Contractors are obliged to keep, both in the conclusion of the contract and in its performance, the principles of honesty and good faith.

423

When there are ambiguous or contradictory clauses in the adhesion contract, the interpretation most favorable to the adherent must be adopted.

424

In adhesion contracts, terms that stipulate the early waiver by the adherent of a right resulting from the nature of the business are null and void.

478

In contracts with continuous or deferred performance, if the obligation of one of the parties becomes excessively onerous, with extreme advantage for the other, due to extraordinary and unpredictable events, the debtor may request the termination of the contract. The effects of the decision will be retroactive to the date of service.

Legal Basis for Combating Unfair Terms in Free Competition

Another extremely important source for combating unfair terms, especially in contracts whose nature impacts free competition, is Article 36 of Law #12,529/2013, also known as the Antitrust Law, which defines as economic infractions, regardless of fault, acts in any form manifested, which have as their object or may produce the following effects, even if they are not achieved:

1. limit, distort or in any way harm free competition or free enterprise;

2. dominate the relevant market for goods or services;

3. arbitrarily increase profits; and

4. abusively exercise a dominant position.

Furthermore, the aforementioned legal provision lists the conduct that characterizes an infraction of the economic order, making it clear that if any other conduct characterizes one of the conditions described above, it will also be considered an infraction of the economic order:

1. agree, combine, manipulate or adjust with a competitor, in any form:

a) the prices of goods or services offered individually;

b) the production or marketing of a restricted or limited quantity of goods or the provision of a restricted or limited number, volume or frequency of services;

c) the division of parts or segments of a current or potential market for goods or services, by means of, among others, the distribution of customers, suppliers, regions or periods;

d) prices, conditions, advantages or abstention in public bidding;

2. promote, obtain or influence the adoption of uniform or concerted commercial conduct among competitors;

3. limit or prevent new companies from accessing the market;

4. create difficulties in the establishment, operation or development of a competing company or supplier, purchaser or financier of goods or services;

5. prevent competitors from accessing sources of inputs, raw materials, equipment or technology, as well as distribution channels;

6. demand or grant exclusivity for the dissemination of advertising in the mass media;

7. use deceptive means to cause third party prices to fluctuate;

8. regulate markets for goods or services, establishing agreements to limit or control research and technological development, the production of goods or the provision of services, or to hinder investments intended for the production of goods or services or their distribution;

9. impose, in the trade of goods or services, on distributors, retailers and representatives resale prices, discounts, payment terms, minimum or maximum quantities, profit margin or any other marketing conditions relating to their business with third parties;

10. discriminate against purchasers or suppliers of goods or services by means of differentiated pricing or operating conditions for the sale or provision of services;

11. refuse to sell goods or provide services, within the payment conditions normal to commercial customs and practices;

12. hinder or interrupt the continuity or development of indefinite-term commercial relations due to the other party's refusal to submit to unjustifiable or anti-competitive commercial clauses and conditions;

13. destroy, render useless or hoard raw materials, intermediate or finished products, as well as destroy, render useless or hinder the operation of equipment intended to produce, distribute or transport them;

14. hoard or prevent the exploitation of industrial or intellectual property rights or technology;

15. sell goods or providing services unjustifiably below cost price;

16. retain production or consumer goods, except to ensure coverage of production costs;

17. partially or totally cease the company's activities without proven legitimate cause;  

18. making the sale of a good subject to the acquisition of another or the use of a service, or making the provision of a service subject to the use of another or the acquisition of a good; and

19. the abusive exercise or exploitation of industrial, intellectual, technology or trademark property rights.

What to do when faced with Unfair Terms?

When faced with unfair terms, it is recommended that the contracting party adopt the following measures:

1. Seek an amicable solution with the other contracting party, already taking a suggestion to modify the aforementioned clause, in order to seek contractual balance;

2. If the first step is unsuccessful and it is a consumer relationship, it is recommended that consumer protection and defense entities be sought;

3. If the second step is unsuccessful or if it is not a consumer relationship, it is recommended that the injured party seeks to defend their rights before the judiciary, so that the unfair term in question can be declared null and void by the judge.

It is important to remember that, if the unfair term is declared null and void, the remainder of the contract, as a rule, remains in full force; unless such clause is essential to its nature.

No items found.