‍

The business environment is ever-changing, and despite reaching an agreement that reflects the intentions of both parties, various factors can disrupt the initially agreed-upon commercial arrangement.

Legal professionals often emphasize the negotiation phase and the structural aspects of a contract, neglecting clauses pertaining to contract termination by employing generic and standardized language across all their contracts. However, it is crucial to recognize that ending contractual relationships, for any reason, holds equal importance to the execution of the contract itself. Therefore, it is essential to proactively anticipate potential scenarios that could lead to termination.

Brazilian legislation and doctrine outline specific methods for terminating contractual relationships, including termination upon expiration of the contract term. Essentially, when a contract reaches its designated term, obligations between the parties typically cease. This commonly occurs in transactions involving the acquisition of products and goods: when Company A seeks to procure goods from Company B for its operations, a product acquisition contract is executed between the parties, with validity extending until the goods specified in the contract are delivered.

In addition to cases of organic termination of the contract term, there is the possibility of parties mutually or unilaterally deciding to rescind the celebrated legal instrument, whether this rescission is by mutual agreement or not.

In instances where a party wishes to terminate the contractual relationship before the end of the contract, Brazilian lawmakers recognize two possibilities: termination of the contract and the unilateral or mutual rescission of the contract.

Contract termination occurs when one of the signatory parties fails to fulfill one or more obligations as outlined within the signed agreement or when a nullity is found within the formation of the contract, as provided for in Articles 474 and 475 of the Brazilian Civil Code .

For example, when Company X contracts the provision of a service offered by Company Y, but Company Y then discontinues the contracted service or if Company X ceases payment, the aggrieved party may request the termination of the contract and even seek compensation for losses and damages, as per Article 475 of the Brazilian Civil Code.

Given the potential for nonperformance by either party, it is crucial for contracts to include clear termination clauses which will outline measures to be taken in the event of nonperformance by either party. Clear termination clauses provide greater autonomy to parties, as the conditions of nonperformance and the resulting effects thereof on the contract are then defined at the will of the parties.

In this sense, clear termination clauses essentially operate as a risk management instrument authorized by the Brazilian legal system in favor of private autonomy. This provision was established to act as a robust incentive for upright and ethical behavior, thereby increasing predictability and legal security for the parties.

Furthermore, as mentioned in Article 474 of the Brazilian Civil Code, there is the concept of tacit termination. Tacit termination is a provision outlined by the law itself, applicable in cases where parties haven't explicitly outlined the possibility of terminating the contract. In such instances, if one party significantly does not perform on their obligations, i.e., if there is a breach of an obligation deemed critical enough by one of the parties that it renders the aggrieved party uninterest in continuing the contractual relationship due loss of useful business interest; the law permits the contractual relationship to be terminated even if the parties have not provided for such a hypothesis in the contractual instrument. In these situations, the aggrieved party must seek legal recourse, as the termination of the contract will depend on court intervention.

The Brazilian legal system also provides for the possibility of a party choosing to break the contractual relationship and then mutually rescinding the contract regardless of nonperformance by the other party. As provided for in Article 473 of the Brazilian Civil Code, a contract rescission must take place through a manifestation of this will by the withdrawing party to the other party. Then, it must be formalized through by signing a rescission between the contract's original parties, which must comply with the same Civil Code provision   for contracts.

Usually, the withdrawing party sends a formal written notification to the other party, in order to inform their desire to end said contractual relationship. Although the law does not establish deadlines or forms for notification, it is customary to send a written notification 30 days in advance to the other party.

Ultimately, the best-case scenario is when the conditions of rescission are spelled out in the contract, adhering to the terms that were previously agreed upon, and with the option to impose penalties for early termination or noncompliance with those requirements.

‍

‍